WHY FAISAL SHAHZAD BOMBED TIMES SQUARE
by Pervez Hoodbhoy

The man who tried to set off a car bomb in Times Square was a Pakistani.
Why is this unsurprising? Answer: because when you hold a burning match to a
gasoline tank, the laws of chemistry demand combustion. As anti-American
lava spews uninterrupted from the fiery volcanoes of Pakistan's private
television channels and newspapers, a collective psychosis grips the
country's youth.  Murderous intent follows with the conviction that the US
is responsible for all ills, both in Pakistan and the world of Islam.

Faisal Shahzad, with designer sunglasses and an MBA degree from the
University of Bridgeport, acquired that murderous intent. Living his
formative years in Karachi, he typifies the young Pakistani who grew up in
the shadow of Zia-ul-Haq's hate-based education curriculum. The son of a
retired Air Vice-Marshal, life was easy as was getting US citizenship
subsequently. But at some point the toxic schooling and media tutoring must
have kicked in. There was guilt as he saw pictures of Gaza's dead children
and related them to US support for Israel. A little internet browsing, or
perhaps the local mosque, steered him towards the idea of an Islamic
caliphate. This solution to the world's problems would require, of course,
the US to be damaged and destroyed.  Hence Shahzad's trip to Waziristan.

Ideas considered extreme a decade ago are now mainstream. A private survey
carried out by a European embassy based in Islamabad found that only 4% of
Pakistanis polled speak well of America, 96% against. Although Pakistan and
the US are formal allies, in the public perception the US has ousted India
as Pakistan's number one enemy. Remarkably, anti-US sentiment rises in
proportion to aid received. Say one good word about the US, and you are
automatically labeled as its agent. From what popular TV anchors had to say
about it, Kerry-Lugar's $7.5 billion may well have been money that the US
wants to steal from Pakistan rather than give to it.

Pakistan is certainly not the world's only country where America is
unpopular.  In pursuit of its self-interest, wealth and security, the US has
waged illegal wars, bribed, bullied and overthrown governments, supported
tyrants and military governments, and undermined movements for progressive
change. But paradoxically the US is disliked far more in Pakistan than in
countries which have born the direct brunt of American attacks - Cuba,
Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Why?

Drone strikes are a common but false explanation. Foreign minister Shah
Mahmood Qureshi implicitly justifies the Times Square bombing as retaliation
but this does not bear up. Drone attacks have killed some innocents, but
they have devastated militant operations in Waziristan while causing far
less collateral damage than Pakistani artillery or airpower. On the other
hand, the cities of Hanoi and Haiphong were carpet-bombed by B-52 bombers
and Vietnam's jungles were defoliated with Agent Orange. Yet, Vietnam never
developed deep visceral feelings like those in Pakistan.

Finding truer reasons requires deeper digging. In part, Pakistan displays
the resentment and self-loathing of a client state for its paymaster.
US-Pakistan relations are frankly transactional today, but the master-client
relationship is old. Indeed, Pakistan chose this path because confronting
India over Kashmir demanded heavy militarization and big defense budgets.
So, in the 1960's, Pakistan willingly entered into the SEATO and CENTO
military pacts, and was proud to be called "America's most allied ally". The
Pakistan Army became the most powerful, well-equipped and well-organized
institution in the country.  This also put Pakistan on the external dole.

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, even as it brought in windfall
profits, deepened the dependence. Paid by the US to create the anti-Soviet
jihadist apparatus, Pakistan is now being paid again to fight that war's
blowback. Pakistan then entered George W. Bush's war on terror to enhance
America's security - a fact that further hurt self-esteem. It is a separate
matter that Pakistan fights that very war for its own survival, and must
call upon its army to protect the population from throat-slitting,
hand-chopping, girl-whipping fanatics.

Passing the buck is equally fundamental to Pakistan's anti-Americanism. It
is in human nature to blame others for one's own failures. Pakistan has long
teetered between being a failed state and a failing state. The rich won't
pay taxes? Little electricity? Sewage-contaminated drinking water?
Kashmir unsolved? Just blame it on the Americans. This phenomenon exists
elsewhere too.  For example, one recently saw the amazing spectacle of Hamid
Karzai threatening to join the Taliban and lashing out against Americans
because they (probably correctly) suggested he committed electoral fraud.

Tragically for Pakistan, anti-Americanism plays squarely into the hands of
Islamic militants. They vigorously promote the notion of an Islam-West war
when, in fact, they actually wage armed struggle to remake society. They
will keep fighting this war even if America were to miraculously evaporate
into space. Created by poverty, a war-culture, and the macabre manipulations
of Pakistan's intelligence services, they seek a total transformation of
society.  This means eliminating music, art, entertainment, and all
manifestations of modernity. Side goals include chasing away the few
surviving native Christians, Sikhs, and Hindus.

At a time when the country needs clarity of thought to successfully fight
extremism, simple bipolar explanations are inadequate. The moralistic
question "Is America good or bad?" is futile. There is little doubt that the
US has committed acts of aggression as in Iraq, worsened the Palestine
problem, and maintains the world's largest military machine. We also know
that it will make a deal with the Taliban if perceived to be in America's
self-interest, and it will do so even if that means abandoning the
Afghanistan's people to blood-thirsty fanatics.

Yet, it would be wrong to scorn the humanitarian impulse behind US
assistance in times of desperation. Shall we simply write off massive US
assistance to Pakistan at the time of the dreadful earthquake of 2005? Or to
tsunami affected countries in 2004 and to Haiti in 2010? In truth, the US is
no more selfish or altruistic than any other country of the world.
And it treats its Muslim citizens infinitely better than we treat
non-Muslims in Pakistan.

Instead of pronouncing moral judgments on everything and anything, we
Pakistanis need to reaffirm what is truly important for our people: peace,
economic justice, good governance, rule of law, accountability of rulers,
women's rights, and rationality in human affairs. Washington must be firmly
resisted, but only when it seeks to drag Pakistan away from these goals.
More frenzied anti-Americanism will only produce more Faisal Shahzads.

-----------
The author teaches at Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad.